Breakaway Italian Sect Honors Extra Virgin Mary

ROME, Italy. Angered by what they consider a decline in devotion to the Blessed Virgin Mary, mother of Jesus Christ, a splinter group of Roman Catholic traditionalists has formed a new schism within the church that will worship “Extra Virgin Mary”.

 

A call for extra virginity.

“We need a new Mary for a new age,” says the cult’s leader, Antonio d’Erario. “Not just a virgin–an extra virgin.”

Purer than the regular stuff.

The term “extra virgin” is used to refer to the highest quality olive oil. “Extra virgin olive oil is characterized by perfect flavor and odor and a maximum acidity of 1%,” says Rocco Donatelli, an olive buyer for the del O’rro brand of food products. “Regular olive oil is like Madonna–it’s like a virgin, but it’s not the real thing.”

 

Madonna: Not the real thing.

Worship of the Blessed Virgin is particularly strong in this predominantly Catholic country, where virginity until marriage or sexual intercourse, whichever comes first, is common. “This Madonna–she had sex with Dennis Rodman,” notes cult member Donna de Varonna. “You might as well drink out of a urinal,” she says as she spits on the ground.

 

Rodman:  “It’s fun trading clothes with Madonna!”

British bookmakers, who will lay odds on nearly any proposition, peg the new faith as a 5-1 shot to overtake Episcopalianism and other high-income Protestant denominations within a year. “We were short on Scientology, and look what happened to us,” says bookie Reg Winstall of Liverpool. “They wiped us out when they crushed the Presbyterians last year.”

 

“If you pass out it doesn’t count.”

There is no comparable Marian cult in America, although coeds at Southern colleges often undergo a transformation that they claim makes them “born-again” virgins.  “I kinda had sex with Jimmy Ray Lester after a Sigma Nu party once,” says Mary Louise Mulleneau, a sophomore at Southern Methodist University.  “Then I met Lee Twitchell, Jr., whose daddy owns a bunch of hotels and stuff.  I asked the girls in my sorority, and they said if you were passed out the first time it doesn’t count.”

1.3 Girls for Every Boy

The demographic news from the east and the west could not be more different, and yet the potential consequences are similarly dire.

            China will have 24 million more men than women by the end of this decade.  Researchers anticipate that low-income schlubs will have trouble finding spouses and will turn to crime. 

            In the U.S. the opposite is true.  Here, we have an excess of women over men—in round numbers, about four million.  At a 1.3 to 1 female-to-male ratio we’re not quite the “Two girls for every boy” Valhalla dreamt of by Jan and Dean in “Surf City,” but we’re getting there.

Jan and Dean

            An environment in which there is a material imbalance between the two major sex groups is not a happy one.  At some American colleges the grade point average of incoming female students is half a point higher than the men’s.  It has to be, anti-discrimination laws be damned, in order to keep the female/male ratio below 60/40, at which point the excess supply of women causes male students to become heartless cads (if they aren’t already), and move without remorse from one debauched coed to another like bees flitting from flower to flower.

            Thinking globally and acting locally, there is only one thing to do.

            It’s time to start exporting American women to China.

            Don’t get me wrong.  My mom was an American woman, my sisters are American women, I married an American woman—some of my best friends are American women.  But we’re all in this together.  We’d better start working as a harmonious crew in order to right Spaceship Earth, which has drifted dangerously off course.

            If you think this proposal is absurd, consider the alternative.

            We have nowhere to put 24 million surplus Chinese men.  Even if we did, the U.S. currently has a $20.2 billion trade deficit with China, an all-time high.  We need to increase our exports, not our imports, and the U.S. takes a back seat to no one in the production and manufacture of American women. 

            But, you may ask, what harm can there be in having extra women around?  Let me give you an example.

            At the college I attended males outnumbered females by a ratio of 1.4 to 1, and it was not unusual for hostilities between men over women to escalate rapidly from cutting remarks to outright violence.  At a party in my apartment one night I was surprised to find two normally affable Jewish men in my bedroom, squaring off over a shikse who’d been playing one off against the other.

            “Guys–break it up,” I said, stepping between them.  “Look at you!” I yelled, and they fell silent in embarrassment.  “This is my bedroom,” I said.  “I need it for a fight with an addle-brained scion of an old New England WASP family over an English major who’s got a balcony you could do Shakespeare from!”

Addle-brained preppy doofus.

            Reverse the genders and you’ll see the problem.  Do we really want American women slipping off for hair-pulling matches in lavishly-furnished bedrooms, exposing high thread-count sheets, pillow shams and duvet covers to decorating mayhem?  I don’t think so.

            Of course, it isn’t every woman who needs to be exported, it’s just the ones who are running up huge debts that have made China our largest creditor—we owe them $13 billion!  Did you borrow money from China?  I know I didn’t.  It must have been those surplus women.

             Exporting free-spending women to China has a “multiplier” effect with ancillary benefits for our economy.  Fewer “hostess” gifts will be purchased and given to other women, who must then respond with even nicer presents when the favor is returned.  We’d finally get off the beggar-thy-neighbor treadmill and start living within our means.

            Getting men to volunteer their wives for export will be difficult, and we can anticipate tearful scenes of separation on docks as couples kiss before the women are loaded onto container ships by sweating stevedores.  Men watching on TV can turn to their wives and say “If you get your shopping under control, we may be able to preserve you for domestic consumption rather than export.”

            Think about it, okay?  The wife you save may be your own.

To Keep Best Clients, Law Firm Tries Frequent Plaintiff Reward Cards

LOS ANGELES.  Judy Balser is a forty-something divorcee who takes pride in the distinguished place she holds in American legal history, even though she never went to law school.  “I know I’m not Rosa Parks or anything,” she says as she rummages through her cluttered purse, “but I’m probably more famous than that Dred Scott guy.”

“I know my Rewards card is in there somewhere!”

Balser has served as lead plaintiff in a number of class actions suits that have broken new legal ground, including the case involving lip-synching by Milli Vanilli that resulted in credit vouchers good for $4.50 for each consumer who purchased a CD by the dance-pop duo, and $3.5 million in legal fees for her law firm, Schatz, Naftrak, Bullens & Wormer.

Milli Vanilli:  Actually, it’s probably better if you don’t sing.

“I wasn’t just a straw man,” she says using a term she’s picked up hanging around lawyers for two decades.  “I brought them the class action against the perfume spritzer girls at Lord & Taylor because I have an allergy to Ralph Lauren cologne.”

“Don’t spritz her–she’ll sue you.”

But last year Balser looked back on her career as a professional plaintiff and decided that maybe she’d sold herself short.  “I looked at the big fancy cars my lawyers were driving and decided I wanted some of that action,” she says.

Law firm reception area, furnished by Chia Pet.

When name partner Gary Schatz heard that one of his most dependable plaintiffs was upset, he acted fast.  “I need to keep clients happy,” he says, his brow furrowing into a look of manufactured concern.  “Since I spend my working days making other people miserable, it’s not something I know a whole lot about.”

“Who ordered the grandissimo vanilla latte with an uncontested divorce?”

But Schatz had a “Eureka” moment as he stood in line to get his latte at the Java Hut, the coffee shop on the ground floor of his office building.  “I saw people who don’t dress as well as I do getting these little tickets punched, and it turns out you get a free cup after you buy ten,” he recalls.  “I thought we might try to reward Judy’s loyalty that way.”

“I’ll have a light roast, and I’d like to sue that guy who cut in front of me.”

So Schatz’s firm created what is believed to be the first Frequent Plaintiffs Reward Card, a promotion that gives clients a free case after they’ve sued ten other people.  “It’s a big improvement,” Balser says.  “I used to get a crappy fruit basket at the holidays, and I prefer chocolate.”

“We also have an early bird special for those who can get to court before 9:30.”

With eight holes in her card Balser is approaching her first freebie, and as she waits to pick up her caramel macchiato at the Java Hut she looks dreamily off into the distance, considering how she’ll use it.  “There’s those putzes at the dry cleaner who lost a button on one of my sweaters,” she says weighing her options carefully.  “On the other hand, I haven’t gotten my first husband’s last nickel.”

New York Times Drops Plagiarism Ban, Urges Recycling

NEW YORK.  The New York Times will today announce a major revision of its ethical rules to permit and even encourage its reporters to plagiarize the work of others.

Sulzberger:  Hmm-”Moby Dick”–sounds familiar.

“One man’s plagiarism is another man’s recycling,” said Publisher Arthur Ochs Sulzberger, Jr.  “Once somebody’s words are published they could end up blowing down the street, or clogging up a storm drain or messing up your yard. We want our reporters to make the world a cleaner, better place.”

 

Kouwe:  “I had my fingers crossed behind my back.”

The action was taken following the dismissal of reporter Zachery Kouwe, whom a Times press release said ”appears to have improperly appropriated wording and passages published by other news organizations,” including The Wall Street Journal and Reuters.  “The proper way to do it,” the press release said, “is to split a few infinitives and throw some quotes around them so that it looks kosher.”

Blair:  “What about the Book Review?  Most of that’s fiction.”

In 2003, Times reporter Jayson Blair resigned from the paper after it became clear that he had engaged in plagiarism and fabrications in his work.  Kouwe defended his writing saying “I don’t make stuff up–I steal it fair and square.”

Viswanathan: “You’re rubber, I’m glue.  What you write sticks to me when it bounces off you.”   

Many Times staffers have been recipients of Nieman Fellowships to study at Harvard University, the plagiarism capital of America.  Members of the Harvard community accused of plagiarism include an Overseer of the university–Doris Kearns Goodwin–two members of the law school faculty, Laurence Tribe and Charles Ogletree, and Kaavya Viswanathan, an undergraduate student who received a $500,000 advance for a novel–”How Opal Got Kissed, Got Wild and Got a Life”–that contained extended passages from the Cleveland, Ohio, Yellow Pages.

 

Zippy the Pinhead, Paul Krugman: Pick your pundit.

Under the new policy Times reporters who use the work of others without attribution will be referred to as “recyclers” and will not be subject to penalties.  Recycling bins will be placed throughout the Times newsroom for deposit of copies of national and regional newspapers other than The Boston Globe, which is owned by The New York Times Company.  “There’s no point in plagiarizing from the Globe,” Sulzberger said.  “The only difference between our two papers is they have Zippy the Pinhead, and we have Paul Krugman.”

Take the 40 Million Years Without Sex Challenge!

Scientists have determined that a tiny freshwater organism known as the ”bdelloid rotifer” gave up sex 40 million years ago.  And you thought the spark had gone out of your marriage.

Bdelloid rotifer:  “Not this millenium, dear–I have a headache.”

While various weird organisms such as Andy Warhol have claimed to be asexual, the bdelloid rotifers have actually pulled it off.  I know this is only the second paragraph of this post, but did I mention that all bdelloid rotifers are female?

Andy Warhol:  Can’t hold a candle to a bdelloid rotifer.

That’s right.  The bdelloid rotifers have created an all-female, sex-free society.  You can imagine the pillow talk between the last male bdelloid rotifer and his significant other:

FEMALE BDR:  What are you doing?

MALE BDR:  I just want to snuggle . . .

FEMALE BDR:  Yeah right.  Go to sleep.

MALE BDR:  We never have sex anymore!

FEMALE BDR:  You say that like it’s a bad thing.

“C’mon–you’re acting like a bdelloid rotifer!”

According to two Harvard University scientists, bdelloid rotifers can withstand dessication at any life stage and “spring back into action after being dried out.”  My question is–how do they know?  Once you’ve done away with the last male bdelloid rotifer, where does a dried-up female bdelloid rotifer go for action?  A singles bar where everybody else in the place is the same sex as you and just as desperate?  I’m sorry, by then it’s too late.

“What time does the action start around here?”

The truly amazing aspect of this story is that the scientists who were looking at these creatures didn’t think it was a big deal that they hadn’t had sex in forty million years.  The bdelloid rotifers, that is, not the scientists.

“Forty million years without sex?  This is not so remarkable.”

No, what got the scientists all excited was how the bdelloid rotifers had developed a substitute for a byproduct of sexual procreation, namely, the beneficial incorporation of new genetic material into the offspring of a species that enables them to adapt to changing circumstances.  That technique?  Female bdelloid rotifers steal DNA from other organisms!

Women’s book group, or more precisely, chardonnay group.

So next time your wife comes home from book group reeking of chardonnay and says she’s too tired for sex, ask her this question:  “Have you ‘gals’ been stealing DNA again?”

Canada Devalues Currency, Demands Hockey Recount

VANCOUVER.  Stunned by a 5-3 loss in the Winter Olympics to the United States in its national sport of hockey, Canadian officials today devalued the country’s currency against those of other hockey-playing countries, a move they hope will send the game into overtime.

“We cannot stand idly by while nations with ‘z’s' like Switzerland and the Czech Republic surpass us in the hockey arms race,” said Stephen Harper, who a Google search revealed was Prime Minister of Canada.  “Devaluation is a strategy that worked for us in tennis, where the rules of Canadian Doubles permit us to have an extra player on our side of the net.”

“The score is US 2, Canada .96.”

The Canadian dollar is currently exchangeable into just 96 cents in American money, causing Canadian forwards to come up short against other hockey players.  “I had an odd-man rush against Ryan Miller last night,” said Canada’s star forward Sidney Crosby of the US goalie, “but at current exchange rates that dropped to a one-on-one and he stoned me.”

Canadian loon

The Canadian dollar is also referred to as the “loonie”, after the Canadian loon.  A member of the Unification Church is referred to as a “Moonie” after the Reverend Sun Myung Moon, its founder. 

Sun Myung Moon:  A different kind of loonie

It has been seventeen years since a Canadian hockey team won the Stanley Cup, and Canada has won the gold medal in the sport only once in the last eight Winter Olympics.  Canadian youngsters, who once would proudly display gaps in their teeth caused by blows to the mouth from flying pucks, are abandoning hockey for fencing, macrame and stamp collecting.


Macrame teddy:  Why the puck shouldn’t they?

When a reporter pointed out that in order to correct Canada’s current hockey imbalance the country should technically revalue the loonie upwards rather than downwards, Harper was undeterred.  “Higher, lower, whatever,” he replied with an impatient tone.  “If we screw up, we’ll get it right the next time.”

Attack of the Killer Female Orgasms!

An Orgasm Almost Killed Her (We Are Not Kidding)

                                                       Headline, Cosmopolitan.

            I had just climaxed after more than a little foreplay and the usual huffing and puffing.  I flopped over on my back, exhausted and ready for sleep.

             “Ahem,” the woman next to me ahemmed, as if clearing her throat, although I knew she wasn’t.

           “Sounds like you’re getting a cold.  Most doctors recommend plenty of rest and lots of fluids,” I said as I rolled over.

            “I’m trying to let you know that you may be done, but I’m not.”

            I propped myself up on one elbow, and gave her the most sympathetic Alan Alda-type puppy dog look I could muster.

            “You know, I’d love to, but I’m tired, and I don’t want to put your life in danger.”

            “What?” she asked, wide-eyed and wide awake now.

            “There are serious health risks involved in the female orgasm.  You could die from one.”

            She gave me a look that spoke volumes, like an installment-plan encyclopedia.  “You just want to go to sleep,” she said.  “Where did you come up with that baloney?”

            “Cosmopolitan—the fun, fabulous lifestyle magazine.  It’s the best-selling young woman’s rag in the world, you know.”

            “I didn’t know that Cosmo published medical research,” she said, one eyebrow arching upwards.

            “Oh, absolutely.  Just like The New England Journal of Medicine, or Lancet.”

            “So this stuff is legitimate?  Peer-reviewed, control groups, double-blind tests?”

            “Uh, I don’t know about that.  It was on the page opposite ‘Icebreakers:  Conversation Starters That Will Make You the Most Interesting Person in the Room!’”

            “So the usual rigorous Cosmo scientific method?”

            “That’s right.  I mean, they have a ‘Cosmo Community’ feature on the web site.  I bet they got a lot of hits, with women weighing in about near-death experiences.  On the come, so to speak.”

            “Well, it’s not very gentlemanly of you.”

            “Gentleman, schmentleman.  If I, uh, accommodate you, I could be guilty of manslaughter.  Or womanslaughter.”

            “I think you’re just lazy.”

            “Please.  Would I make you go skydiving right now, or ride a motorcycle without a helmet?”

            “I hope not.  I’m not really dressed for outdoor sports.”

            “Well, I hate to sound like a TV ad for a new drug, but you should consult your doctor before insisting upon reaching climax.  Also, closed course, professional driver.” 

            “Well, it all strikes me as a trifle ungracious.”

            “My mother told me never to trifle with a woman.”

            “Did she say anything about leaving one hanging?”

            “No.  Say, did you ever see that Ike & Tina Turner routine where they sing the song ‘I’ve Been Loving You Too Long’ and when it’s over, Ike says ‘Well, I got mine, I hope you got yours.’”

            “Can’t say that I have.”

            “It’s a real show stopper, lots of heavy breathing . . .”

            “Well, this show has stopped.  How about an encore?”

            “I don’t know.  I’d hate to be responsible.  How would I explain it to your relatives at the funeral?”

            “Easy.  ‘She died doing the thing she loved.’”

In Goodwill Gesture, Prince Charles Launches Polo for the Poor

LONDON.  With the recent vote to replace hereditary peers with elected delegates to the House of Lords, the British monarchy is running scared.  The English and Scots crowns were united in a single monarch–James VI–in 1603, and for four centuries the monarchy has withstood an ABC of threats to its reign; an abdication (King Edward VIII), a bulemic (Princess Diana of Wales), and Charles, Prince of Wales.  Now, faced with the prospect that it will be replaced by an elected chief executive, the empire is striking back, so to speak, reaching out to constituents whom it has largely ignored in the past.

James VI: “Two crowns repose upon my head, I must admit, they’re heavy as lead.” 

“The folks in Brixton are too busy rioting and clubbing for us to care much about them,” said Alexander Patrick Gregers Richard Windsor, who goes by the nickname “Earl of Ulster”.  “As long as they’re only shooting at each other, why should we care?”

“I do so love to watch the poor people–they’re so, you know, rhythmic!”

But all that will change if Prince Charles has his way.  “It’s time for us to become more involved with the people who support our gaudy lifestyle,” he said at a press conference called to announce a new “Chukkas for Children” program, which will instruct disadvantaged youth in the finer points of polo, a game that has previously been restricted to British upper classes.  “If the people are going to pay for my string of polo ponies, they jolly well ought to be able to ride them around a bit, don’t you think?”

Prince Charles

Charles is an accomplished polo player, a source of pride and comfort to his subjects.  “The more time he spends up on a polo pony, the less time he has to bugger up the government,” says Gilly Firth, a housewife who lives in Brixton.  “It also cuts down on the number of irrelevant subjects he can spout off on, like modern architecture and McDonald’s.”

Buzkashi Fever–Catch It!

Polo traces its origins to Buzkashi or “goat grabbing”, the national sport of Afghanistan.  The goal of the game is to grab the carcass of a headless goat, streak past other players on horseback and pitch the carcass across a goal line or into a target circle or vat.  Prizes range from fine turbans to home yogurt makers and “nice” Ralph Lauren sweaters.  “It’s definitely a sport that can pay off in the long run for a toff who knows how to ride a bit,” according to Khuda Gawah, editor of Buzkashi Fever, a magazine devoted to the sport.

Parker-Bowles, in the bloom of youth.

Charles developed an interest in the game in his youth, and found that his experience paid off by providing him with an ice-breaker in chilly social situations.  “‘I play polo,’ the Prince would say to young women he was introduced to such as Camilla Parker-Bowles, followed by the seemingly innocent question ‘Do you like to ride?’” according to London Daily World society correspondent Edmund Ponsby-Britt.  “If they answered ‘Yes’, he’d say ‘Oh, so you like the feel of a wild beast between your legs?’.  The girl would then slap Charles and he’d go home and have a nocturnal emission.”

Brixton Market:  “That’s a nice-looking nag you’ve got there, Guv’nor.”

As the Prince and three of his mates makes their way on horseback down the crowded streets of London’s Brixton neighborhood, a gritty multi-racial area of South London, they are met with stares and some hostility from residents who’ve never seen a polo pony before.  “We’re proud folks, we are,” says Gilly Firth.  “People come from miles around to purchase illicit drugs here, and it won’t help business if they have to step over horse manure to get them.”

“I’d like to have me a polo pony some day, I would!”

Young boys, excited at the power and beauty of the thoroughbred horses the royal party rides, come running up to greet them.  “Give us some money, would ya governor?” one of them yells at Colin Weston-Smith, who plays the no. 2 position on the Prince’s team.  “Not likely,” the horseman replies.  “We’re just here to spread good will and teach you brats the value of fresh air and exercise.”

“Go on with ya then,” the boy yells as he throws a rock, causing a horse to rear, nearly throwing his rider onto the pavement.

“What ho!”

“Let’s not argue, boys,” Charles says as he intervenes.  “We’ve brought plenty of equipment for you to use,” and indeed bringing up the rear is an escort leading a string of sleek polo ponies, ready to challenge the Prince’s equine arsenal in a pick-up game of polo in Brixton’s open-air market area.

“There’s no room in me mum’s flat as it is–where am I going to keep a bloody horse?”

The boys seem suspicious at first, but after petting the horses for a bit they feel comfortable enough to mount them and take the helmets and mallets that Charles offer them.  “The point of the game is to drive the ball through the goal,” Charles says.  “Let’s say yours is between the newstand and the fish ‘n chips shop down there, and ours is between the fishmonger and the green grocer over here.”

“If you don’t mind, your pony’s standing on me foot.”

“All right–yer on!” one of the boys shouts as he turns his horse to take his position.  An umpire bowls the ball into the middle of the street, and play begins.   Pedestrians scatter as the two teams clash in the middle of an intersection, and a blow by one of Charles’ teammates causes the ball to carom off a curbstone and strike an elderly woman’s shopping bag, breaking a carton of eggs.  “Don’t worry ma’am,” shouts Weston-Smith.  “It’s for a good cause.”

“Ask your mum to step aside for a moment, I’m going to shoot.”

“You’ll be fully reimbursed from the Civil List,” Charles says to her, referring to the annual appropriation received by The Royal Family in exchange for surrender of Crown Lands.  “I should hope so,” the woman says with difficulty as she struggles to stand up.  “I was going to bake me husband a cake,” she says.  “There’s a lot of cholesterol in eggs,” Charles says as he rides off.  “They’re not good for you, y’know.”

“We could have swept the streets with you little buggers, but we’re building goodwill here.”

The boys fall behind two-to-nil in the first chukka, but rally after a tea break to even the score, at which point Charles pronounces the game a tie in the interest of preserving the feelings of good will produced by the afternoon’s activity.  “Everyone’s entitled to keep his equipment as a gift of The Royal Family.”

“Hooray!” one of the boys exclaims.  “I’ve always wanted a pony!”

Obama Hails Notaries as 7th, Maybe 8th Line of Defense Against Terror

ARLINGTON, Va.  Speaking to a capacity crowd at the annual convention of the National Notary Public Association, President Barack Obama today hailed notaries as vital to America’s efforts to defend itself against terrorism.

“You guys are doin’ a heckuva job!”

“After the Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines, police and firemen, notary publics–or is it notaries public?–play an essential role in our nation’s defense by ensuring that terrorists do not forge installment sale contracts for major appliances,” Obama said to raucous cheers.  “Wait a minute,” the President continued after quieting the crowd.  “I forgot the Coast Guard–they’re ahead of you, too.”

“You have got one bitchin’ cool stamp, man!”

Obama’s appearance before the group represented a bit of fence-mending on his part.  “Throughout his campaign, Obama ignored us,” said Helen LaRosa, Executive Director of the group.  “He’d go to the Justice of the Peace convention–sure, they’re big spenders.  But notaries–no way.”

Notaries are typically paid state-regulated fees of less than $5 to authenticate signatures on legal documents.  Justices of the Peace are authorized to perform this humble service but can also officiate at weddings for which they receive much larger fees, generally in the range of $50 to $75.

Holmquist:  “Any fishstick with a stamp can notarize something.”

Ellen Holmquist, president-elect of the National Conference of Justices of the Peace, said she didn’t consider the President’s appearance at the convention as a sign that notaries were closing the prestige gap that has long separated them from members of her profession.  “From colonial times to the present, the justice of the peace has always been a leading member of the community,” she noted. ”Any fishstick with a rubber-stamp and a seal can be a notary.”

“Cel-e-brate good times, come on!”

After the President’s speech the notaries retired to the ballroom of the Motel 6 here for an evening of dining and dancing featuring a live disk jockey.  A half hour after the cash bar had opened conventioneers had loosened up a bit and were seen imprinting each other with their notary stamps.

“Things can get a little wild when notaries have had a couple of pops,” said Ernest “Bud” Philmont, of Shrewsbury, Mass.  “People are going to have a lot of ink in strange places when they wake up in the morning.”

In Difficult Times, Some Charities Define Donors Down

BOSTON.  Tonight is the annual fund-raising gala of the Boston Philharmonic Orchestra, and this year’s event will be unique for two reasons; first, it is the sesquicentennial of the group, which has been in continuous existence since 1860, and second, for the first time in its history the board of trustees expects to raise less than it did the year before.

“Can our table have another roll?”

“Even though the market’s up, many people we depend on are still hurting,” says Endicott Walrath, chairman of the board.  “They say old-line Yankees throw nickels around like they’re manhole covers, but this year they’re complaining of back pain when we ask for a penny.”

“We brought our own celery sticks!”

So the BPO is going down-market, seeking to attract more small-dollar donors to bridge the gap left by the six-figure check writers of past years.  “We’ve had to create a few new categories of support,” says Walrath.  “So far we haven’t had to dip down to the level of the valet parking and washroom attendants, but we’re not out of the woods yet.”

“Go ahead–drop a nickel in the slot!”

In the past the BPO listed six levels of donors in the programs that are handed out to the audience before each performance, and which are scrutinized as a “Who’s Who” of Boston society.  “We have Benefactors, Patrons, Sponsors, Sustaining Members, Associates, and Friends,” notes Walrath.  “Since the bottom rung of the ladder starts at $500, many domestics and tradesman have been unable to enjoy the beauty of our orchestra’s music until now.”

“Get your hand off my butt!”

Beneath the “Friend” level there will now be a “Friend of a Friend” classification, available for $250, which includes two tickets to a rehearsal, a colorful t-shirt emblazoned with the orchestra’s logo and the legend “My Friend Went to the Symphony and All I Got Was This Lousy T-Shirt!”, and a temporary BPO tattoo.  “Our marketing department says this should be a hit with Massachusetts motorcycle mavens,” notes Walrath.

“I love a man with thick, luscious nose hairs!”

Beneath the Friend of a Friend strata will be the “Acquaintance” designation, which for $125 entitles donors to use an Express Urinal line during intermissions, a BPO-print “doo-rag”, and first dibs on wads of chewing gum stuck to the underside of seat arms by more affluent audience members.

BPO “Doo Rag”:  “Letitia!  Wut up wif yo bad self?”

And the lowest level of the new support designations?

“Do I know you?” Walrath asks, one eyebrow arched upwards in disdain.

Confused, this reporter re-introduces himself to the silver-haired WASP scion.

“No, that’s what we call it,” he replies.  “For $50 ‘Do I Know You?’ donors are entitled to finish drinks left at the Lodge-Cabot Room bar when the lights begin to flash to signal the end of intermission.”

Blog at WordPress.com.
Theme: Esquire by Matthew Buchanan.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 73 other followers